I store most of my image on a hard drive which is normally not connected. It has excellent batch processing capabilities for tasks such as renaming file, moving and copying them, or creating different versions, jpg or TIFF.Īlthough it is not a full-blown digital asset management (DAM) program it has excellent cataloging capabilities. I use PSP on some images in cases where PSP has editing capabilities that ASP does not. The conversion quality is very good and I use it for 99% of my conversions from raw. It is extremely fast and has extensive editing options. I quickly became a big fan of the program - I shoot only Raw now and ASP is the program I use all the time for adjusting the raw files, creating jpgs and cataloging.ĪSP, as others have said, is primarily a non-destructive raw editing program. I was invited to participate in the Beta testing for AfterShot Pro which meant that I spent enough time to learn it and its quirks. I'd been using PSP for a few years and really liked it but found the Raw conversion quality terrible (it's somewhat better now.) My camera software for Pentax, powered by SilkyPix produced good quality but I did not like the interface. At the time I could not get the hang of Bibble and did not like the others well enough to go there. When I started shooting Raw I tried a number of inexpensive or free programs, among them RawTherapee, ACDSee and Bibble. As with all software, a product will appeal to one person and not at all to another.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |